Kerr Watch

Number of days writer Richard Kerr has failed to inform his Science readers of the confirmation of nanodiamonds at the YDB: 1 year, 1 month, and 14 days

Cosmic Tusk Document Vault


CT Post Calendar

February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Jan    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829  

The Cosmic Tusk Newsletter

Loading...Loading...


Trust but Verify: Independent confirmations of evidence for the Younger Dryas Impact Boundary

Skeptics of the YDIB hypothesis frequently state that “no one can reproduce the YDIB results” (Kerr, 2010); “nobody has found anything” (Kerr, 2010); there is a “lack of reproducibility of data” (Holliday, 2011); and “unique peaks in concentrations at the YD onset have yet to be reproduced” Pinter (2011). These casual dismissals are hurtful to the investigation, and demonstrably false. That independent researchers have identified materials diagnostic of an event of cosmic proportions at 12.9 before present should not be subject to debate.

To wit, I offer below citations of published research confirming the original findings of Firestone, et. al. in 2007. Note that some of these researchers disagree with an extraterrestrial impact as cause and offered alternate hypotheses, but, in every case, those speculating about causation have not conducted any analytical work to determine if their hypotheses are correct.

INDEPENDENT GROUPS with positive results:

MAGNETIC SPHERULES.

Baker et al. (2008)

Fayek (2008)

Ge et al. (2009, page 1)

Haynes et al. (2010, page 1)

LeCompte et al. (2010)

Mahaney (2010a, page 10)

Wu (2011)

NANODIAMONDS.

Ge et al. (2009, page 1)

Tankersley (2009)

Tian (2010, page 1)

Van Hoesel (2011)

Bement et al. (2011)

IRIDIUM.

Beets et al. (2008, page 1)

Sharma et al. (2009)

Haynes et al. (2010, page 1)

Mahaney (2010a, page 10)

Marshall (2011)

Wu (2011)

CARBON SPHERULES and GLASS-LIKE CARBON (some w/ NANODIAMONDS)

Mahaney (2010a, page 10)

Tian (2010, page 1)

Courty et al. (2010)

Ge et al. (2009, page 1)

Baker et al. (2008, page 1)

Tankersley (2009)

CHARCOAL AND BIOMASS BURNING:

Mahaney et al. (2010b)

Ge et al. (2009)

Courty et al. (2010)

HUMAN AND ANIMAL POPULATION DECLINES.

Schroeder (2009)

Steele (2010)

CRATER or IMPACT.

Higgins, et al. (2011)

REFERENCES.

Baker DW, Miranda PJ, Gibbs KE. (2008) Montana Evidence for Extra-Terrestrial Impact Event That Caused Ice-Age Mammal Die-Off. American Geophysical Union, Spring Meeting 2008, abstract #P41A-05.

Beets C, Sharma M, Kasse K, Bohncke S. (2008) Search for Extraterrestrial Osmium at the Allerod – Younger Dryas Boundary. American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2008, abstract #V53A-2150.

Bement L, Carter BJ, Simms A, Madden A. (2011) The Bull Creek valley stream terraces, buried soils, and paleo-environment during the Younger Dryas in the Oklahoma Panhandle, USA. Paper #1447, XVIII INQUA-Congress, 21-27 July 2011 in Bern, Switzerland.

Continue reading Trust but Verify: Independent confirmations of evidence for the Younger Dryas Impact Boundary

[Update] Swiss Kiss: Nanodiamonds and Iridium independently confirmed at Bern INQUA session on Younger Dryas climate crash

The titles for the talks and posters at the upcoming INQUA session, The Enigmatic Younger Dryas, have been posted for some time. Typical of scientific conferences, the narrative abstract revealing the findings (or musings) of the presenter is posted later, a few weeks before the conference. The abstracts for the conference have now been published.

Here again [...]

Skeptic Press Release: Daulton, Pinter and Scott publish finding NO diamonds in Younger Dryas Boundary layer

Impact hypothesis loses its sparkle
Shock-synthesized diamonds said to prove a catastrophic impact killed off North American megafauna can’t be found

Link to Press Release from the Washington University in St. Louis

About 12,900 years ago, a sudden cold snap interrupted the gradual warming that had followed the last Ice Age. The cold lasted for the 1,300-year interval known [...]

Tusk Exclusive: Bunch makes brief comments on Daulton paper

Ted Bunch

From an email from Bunch to Leroy Ellenberger:

Dear Leroy – not to worry, Dalton is a competent scientist and did what he could do with the materials given to him. The problem lies with Scott and Pinter.

Some brief reasons why the Dalton et al paper is inept:

1.They did not collect from [...]

Journal of Glaciology: Discovery of nanodiamond rich layer in the Greenland ice sheet

discovery of nanodiamond rich layer in the greenland ice sheet [...]

Tusk drops all pretense of objectivity, joins YD team for Laramie rodeo

Poster for AMQUA in Laramie, Wyoming, August 12-15, 2010.  See here for program.

NatGeo gets it wrong on Carbon Spherules and Nanodiamonds

Don’t get me wrong from the headline.  I love National Geographic.  I have received an issue every month of my entire life.  But the reporter here, John Roach, made a critical mistake in his otherwise largely accurate report regarding Scott and Pinter’s work.

Here is what he says:

What’s more, those spherules are found [...]

Breaking: Dirt balls -- not diamonds?

(Press Release, Royal Holloway, University of London) — A team of scientists – led by Professor Andrew C Scott of the Department of Earth Sciences at Royal Holloway, University of London – have revealed that neither comet nor catastrophe were the cause for abrupt climate change some 12,900 years ago.

Theories [...]