Kerr Watch

Elapsed time since Richard Kerr failed to inform his Science readers of the confirmation of nanodiamonds at the YDB: 5 years, 11 months, and 17 days

PNAS: Diamond peak confirmed at YDB — and Bronze Age collapse, perhaps?

Table 1.

Bement video

Earlier GSA abstract

Co-author spotlight: Andrew S. Madden

Carter, Simms, Benamara….

PNAS Lexus lane? 46,000 hits!

Significance

In 2007, scientists proposed that the start of the Younger Dryas (YD) chronozone (10,900 radiocarbon years ago) and late Pleistocene extinctions resulted from the explosion of a comet in the […]

Nice Dice?: The Bos disputes Harvard

It is safe to say The Bos is becoming obsessed. Someone please count and let me know, but I believe he has four publications this year seeking to undermine the Younger Dryas Boundary Hypothesis. Over time he has published more than a dozen. Today he is back in PNAS — alone — […]

First Harvard, now Dartmouth: More independent evidence for Younger Dryas impact

Vox Clamantis

September 9th, 2013 | Tags: , , , , , , , , , | Category: Great papers, impact markers, PNAS, Younger Dryas Boundary: ET or Not? | 108 comments

But seriously, folks: Harvard bangs a big fat Platinum nail in YDB critic coffin

BBC

The Mail

Phys.org

Crickets

Stein B. Jacobsen? and here and here

Program Note: More recent posts can be found below

July 25th, 2013 | Tags: , , , , , , | Category: impact markers, Independent Confirmations, PNAS, wally broecker, Younger Dryas Boundary: ET or Not? | 11 comments