Uncategorized

Impact deniers

As a wiseman once told me, long periods of quiessence are subject to interruption by stochastic attacks with surprising frequency. So it was no surprise to the Tusk to see the YD impact deniers crawl out of the woodwork and publish a shrill and hysterical denial of peer-reviewed data last week.

I’m happy to publish the ad hominem and unscientific embarrassment that is Holliday et al. 2023. I hope people will read a just a portion of it, and perhaps a bit of related works below.

powell-2022-premature-rejection-in-science-the-case-of-the-younger-dryas-impact-hypothesis holliday 2023 powell-2022-peer-review-and-the-pillar-of-salt-a-case-study

 

Related posts
Uncategorized

Shocked Quartz at the Boundary — and a Plasma Plume in the Backyard

This has been a satisfying week for the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis. For years, critics of the…
Read more
Uncategorized

The Cosmic Tusk Open Access PowerPoint

The Cosmic Tusk is pleased to remind readers that our comprehensive Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis…
Read more
Uncategorized

Nickel Films in the Carolina Bays: Smoking Gun fired from Russia

Nickel Films in the Bays: Smoking Gun from Russia Experiment in Geosciences, Vol. 24, S1 (2018)…
Read more

1 Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *