Exploring abrupt climate change induced by comets and asteroids during human history

Hear! Hear!

Tusk TV begins oral history interviews with newly minted Member of the British Empire

Not long ago before the holiday I asked my friend Chandra Wickramasinghe to take a stab at the first video discussion on the Tusk. We were patient with each other, and each requested a delay before we chatted. But it turned out wonderfully, in my humble opinion, and even included a “synchronistic” aspect. The day after our chat — despite his inconvenient and heretical data — Chandra was duly rewarded for his lifework by Her Majesty the Queen.


From the University of Buckingham:

According to Prof Wickramasinghe, life on earth began with the introduction of bacteria from comets 4,200 million years ago and its subsequent evolution was spurred on with the continuing arrival of new bacteria .This theory was considered controversial at the time but is now in the mainstream of science.

Sri Lankan-born Chandra Wickramasinghe is a former Fellow of Jesus College Cambridge and founder member of the Institute of Astronomy in Cambridge.

He was a professor at Cardiff University from 1973 to 2010, before taking up his post at Buckingham in 2011 running the Buckingham Centre for Astrobiology.

He has published over 350 peer-reviewed papers in scientific journals and more than 30 books.

Prof Wickramasinghe said: “I am delighted to receive this imperial honour from Her Majesty the Queen.

“I was born in what was at the time Ceylon, a British colony, and I feel very much a child of the Empire, so accepting this award has an even greater poignance.

“I value my connection with Buckingham very much.

“I think the theory of cosmic biology that I have worked on for over 40 years will eventually change the way we think about ourselves and the cosmos.

“That process has only just begun.”

University of Buckingham vice-chancellor James Tooley said: “Prof Wickramasinghe’s work has been groundbreaking and his research into comets is now moving into the mainstream of science.

“The university has benefited hugely from his many lectures on the subject over the years.

“This is a much-deserved accolade.

“I commend Prof Wickramasinghe for being awarded an MBE.”

Life in Space

9 Responses

  1. Chandra’s accolade is well-deserved. Much of his work was initially well outside the mainstream, and it has taken almost a generation for it to become widely recognised. It has turned out that panspermia, an ancient notion revived by Chandra and Fred Hoyle, is hard to avoid, given some quite basic assumptions about the Galactic environment (impacts throw biologically active material into space; this happens especially when Oort cloud comets are disturbed when we pass through starforming regions; enough stuff survives to ‘green’ any receptive planets). Fred and Chandra drew attention to the importance of cometary dusting, not just impacts, in mass extinctions, in the late 70s, an idea which is only now getting traction and which, I believe, is crucial to a full understanding of the YDB phenomena.

  2. I second that! Tusk Nation would love to hear George and Bill chew that fat! I mentioned this on YouTube, but George is in a unique position to get some excellent ‘verbal documentation’ with some of the worlds leading scientists for everything Tusk related. I personally can’t wait!

  3. Unfortunately the Queen at the same time awarded the single most disliked Englishman, Tony Blair, a Knight Companion of the Most Noble Order of the Garter, the highest imperial honor.
    There is a petition with more than a million signatures to revoke it at :


    Most governments of the former Empire, including the USA, are reeling from COVID, and NONE mention a single word on cometary RNA, including India, Ceylon, Britain.
    Something is rotten in the state of the Commonwealth!

  4. Persistent info on possible bio-weapon COVID :


    China definitely is dealing with this on a war footing. See the bio-weapon lab list.

    So the question is – if there is actually a COVID bio-weapon strategy, the best way to cover this would be the usual Sir Dearlove Wuhan leak mumble, or Bats – yet even better would be cometary RNA dust, panspermia. The best way to defend is of course a World Health system.

    I do believe, be on guard for a sudden endorsement of a 50-year old theory by none other than the Crown. It is certainly likely panspermia has operated for billions of years, that does not rule out bio-weapons for a few years.

    I sincerely hope ye , Prof Wickramasinghe, are not being set up!

  5. As Russia has found this week, at least 11 Ukrainian bio-labs funded by Pentagon DPRA over decades, the extreme danger of such pathogens being in the hands of people with no qualms, is now being discussed at the UNSC. One pathogen was Coronavirus. Sec. of State staff member Victoria Nuland admitted this under oath.
    This has bubbled in the background for years, with over 300 such labs, all offshore US so not subject to transparency, and now everyone, especially China who was the first Wuhan victim, is demanding explanations.

    There is no way to separate cosmic panspermia from such man-made activities, anymore.
    It sure looks like the bio-weapon/bio-safety have indeed learned from panspermia, for their own nefarious agenda!

  6. Of course, the “historians”, etc. are still squabbling over the “black death”… just never ending noise over something that terminated millions and getting information from never ending historical papers from people who “do not have first hand information”. At least, George and Bill spent a fair share of their lives crawling in the dirt looking for the clues…just my two cents today. Hats off to “original research” outside the bubble. Nothing ever comes from inside the bubble because “peer review” will not allow it. And lets not forget Ignatius L. Donnelly — their still trashing that guy….

  7. Historians are not so much ” squabbling over the Black Death David L Ulrich but rather engaging in a continuous study and debate on the subject . Moreover , a number of them ” do have access to first hand information ” in the sense of primary sources . For some peculiar reason Mike Baillies discoveries and hypotheses laid out in his 2006 publication “New Light on the Black Death ” have not received much in the way of mainstream [ or rather legacy ] media publicity and debate ..

    And the legacy media wonder why they are widely distrusted

    As for Ignatious Donnelly , much like Immanuel Velikovsky’s theories his ideas are not only obsolete but in many regards preposterous……

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Subscribe for Updates

Tax deductible donations to the Comet Research Group can be made here