folder Filed in Hiawatha Crater
Whither Hiawatha?
Top Science story in 2018 receives zero attention or follow-up in 2019
event January 17, 2020 comment 5 Comments

Fourteen months ago the Tusk could not have been happier. Science Magazine not only addressed the Younger Dryas Hypothesis for the first time in a decade, but did so in a lavish, well-written article. The article accompanied the announcement of what seemed could be the long sought ‘smoking gun’ of the YDIH: A massive crater dating to the start of the Younger Dryas.

The astounding discovery of 22-mile wide geologically (and perhaps historically) recent crater immediately went worldwide. Hundreds and hundreds of articles reported the discovery of the “Hiawatha Crater”, mostly drive-by quick takes and rewrites of press releases, but attention nonetheless. Two months later Science named the discovery of Hiawatha crater a top ten runner-up breakthrough discovery of 2018.

Then? Crickets. And I don’t mean the kind crickets that keep you up at night, I mean the kind of crickets you find dead on the basement floor, behind the washing machine.

No follow-up from Science, no science communicators suggesting how the recent crater could be properly dated, no NatGeo on the scene, no TV whatsoever. No “enterprise” articles from the dwindling band of science reporters (now entirely consumed by AGW). No NetFlix.

The challenge to find a large and recent impact crater has appropriately dogged the YDIH and provided cover for its critics since the beginning in 2007. But recall, it took fourteen years for the dinosaur killer’s crater to be found in the Yucatan. And so, to the Comet Research Group, and anyone not ideologically opposed to studying recent impacts, it seemed just a matter of time. Early last year with the discovery of Hiawatha it seemed that time may have been up.

Not long after the impact crater was revealed, it became clear the authors of the study believed the impact could be as recent as the start of the Younger Dryas, ~12,877 years ago. In support of this conclusion, they repeatedly noted the ice above the crater floor was missing ~100,000 years of stratigraphy, and those layers that remained appeared only ten thousand years old.

That’s a pretty good profile for a suspect for the Younger Dryas Impact crater, and in keeping with over 100 previously peer-reviewed papers confirming evidence for an impact at that time. (Apparently the reviewers of the journal article disagreed, and struck more than twenty mentions of the #YDIH before publication.)

But here is the interesting part to the Tusk. There is no disputing the impact is within the last three million years. Yes, the Tusk would like to see it date to ~12,822, but even if the very oldest years of that date range were confirmed,  the Hiawatha Impact should indeed constitute a paleoclimate and anthropological revolution in our understanding of the Pleistocene. Put another way, if the least interesting accepted fact about this impact is true, it should capture the attention of every science communicator on earth.

Humans witnessed and endured the traumatic effects of a collision so violent it left behind a bowl of molten rock larger than Paris.

But, alas, further investigation and public attention were not to be. While fortunate to surface briefly, the subject of the Hiawatha Crater has disappeared, if it could be deemed to ever be visible.

Let’s unpack why. The reason no one addresses the Hiawatha Crater is that the discovery does not fit the political narrative. The Younger Dryas is a political tool, not a scientific investigation. Paleoclimate and ice investigations are only helpful to bureaucracies and communicators if they fuel AGW politics. God forbid a grant seeker undermine the consensus that all climate is earth-local.

Fortunately the AGW narrative is, in an elegant sense, self-destructive. As more and more data is collected and attention is paid to past climate to demonstrate we are at fault, and poking the climate bear, the true origin of abrupt climate change — cosmic impact — will become just as obvious as it did in late 2018.

I don’t believe in conspiracies. I do believe in common, multi-disciplinary, inconveniences. The YDIH is immensely inconvenient in the context of 90% of reported earth and paleo-human science. The Hiawatha Crater also has the potential to improve our understanding of the earth, regardless of when in the last three million years it occurred.

The fact that it happened and nothing is said gives us the cold comfort the impact is recent.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Cancel Post Comment

  1. People would rather read Anti-Trump stuff by the MSM. You give them real news and it bores them.

  2. A couple of months ago I found a video interview of the team that found Hiawatha. Two times during the interview they mentioned that the floor of the crater is still warm and still melting ice. I think they are convinced the crater is young. Are they going to drill and date?

  3. I had a post taken down by the Guardian today. The post talked about the level of temperature increase being so small that oil would run out before the average temperature on earth reached the same level as the benign time known as the Medieval warming period. I questioned too why our top climate scientists werent looking at the Younger Dryas, which was undoubtedly a civilisation changing event, Indeed, it looks like it was a mass extinction event, and a similar event could render mankind extinct.

    The MSM dont like comments such as these. Many Scientists dont like to look at the YDIH with an open mind. Archaeologists dont like to look at the structures and objects that we cannot fashion today, and tell us that massive stones could be hewn by flint and copper tools, lifted by sheet weight of number alone and aligned precisely with a piece of string.

    This begs the question, are these authority figures incompetent, or is there a conspiracy to stop us finding out the truth?

    I know that Graham Hancock and Randall Carlson have said it is the former, that time and evidence is needed to change peoples minds. I am not so sure about this. The evidence of some great events in human history is piled so high that it is difficult if not impossible to refute. The whole subject is so interesting for so many reasons that academics should be swarming all over it. Surely they would want to know what happened and just how high a civilisation man had attained at the time of the events. But as you say, ‘crickets’ and diversions.

    The only way I can explain this is because those in power in academia already know what happened, and they dont want us to know. Knowledge from the past has I believe, been passed down, just not to all of us.

  4. Thanks so much for all of the incredible work you have done in this area, I have personally benefited a lot from the perspectives and understanding I have gained from your bringing this important information to light. It is in this spirit that I raise a concern with a short statement in the article above. I understand the pragmatism in saying “I don’t believe in conspiracy theories”, however anyone with the intellect you possess could easily see how wrought with problems that statement is. It is obvious that conspiracies of all types and breathes have permeated the common history of mankind, so it is a false statement outright. We have even more proof for the likelihood of so called ‘conspiracy theories’ happening throughout human history then we have for the YDIH! Lol.. What is concerning to me is the cost of ignoring the implications of the fact that it is very likely that this information was purposefully suppressed . There is much evidence that points to some type of organized suppression, I am sure you are already familiar with most of that information.The reality is that the controversial gate keeping we see across the disciplines of ‘mainstream science’ does, in effect, serve a number of nefarious purposes for those in power. We cannot solve the challenges the YDIH brings to the table without understanding the whole nature of the challenge, and if there is a willing suppression of this information, understanding that part of the story will be key in our ability to respond and plan for the future. So please consider revising your public position – it is time to take things higher, the people on the other side of this issue are! If we are not shrewd, this important information will never get the level of attention it so urgently needs. Thanks again for all your efforts.